Grocery
The supermarket sector still has weekly foot traffic on its side — so why is it allowing other channels to walk on its confectionery sales share?
Channel Leaders* | |
Chain | Annual Sales (in billions) |
1. The Kroger Co. | $60.6 |
2. Albertson’s Inc. | $40.4 |
3. Safeway Inc. | $38.4 |
4. Ahold USA | $22.5 |
5. Publix Super Markets Inc. | $20.6 |
*Excluding supercenters **For 2005 |
This is no time
for super-markets to dig their heels in old footprints. It used to be that
the channel was king in any food/consumables category, but that is not a
given anymore, not now with such stellar channel (and channel blurring)
competition. The plain and simple fact is — simplicity is what many
other channels are using to reel more consumers in — convenience and
quick meal/snack solutions to targeted customers. If supermarkets want to
reign in the grocery/snack items they used to practically consider their
birthright, they will have to swallow some retail pride and serve up more
consumer-focused solutions.
“The grocery channel has finally woken up.
It’s still in the early stages, but it’s finally starting to
get that the 8-80 market doesn’t exist anymore,” explains Frank
Dell, CEO of Stamford, Conn.-based Dellmart & Co., a researcher and
frequent speaker for the retail industry. “Having multiple target
markets is fine, but they have to determine which customer segments they
are trying to serve.”
|
Of course, some have already put their plans into
action — and quite successfully — Safeway with its Lifestyle
stores, Kroger with its bigger formats (to compete with Wal-Mart) and Aldi
with its limited assortments, as observed by Todd Hale, senior vice
president of Consumer and Shopper Insights, ACNielsen. “A number of
grocery stores have realized that they have to understand what they want to
be to their shoppers,” he maintains. “If you want to be a
successful grocery store retailer, you have to ‘go big’ in
terms of format, ‘go value,’ ‘go niche,’ or go
away. Those are the three kinds of players we think are going to make
it.”
Consolidation pressure
Within the supermarket channel, internal consolidation
forces are taking their toll on the scope of things. “Larger chains
are absorbing smaller chains and by doing that, they’re trying to
standardize what they’re doing, but at the same time, they have to
understand they have to differentiate,” says Anthony Raissen,
president of marketing consulting company InterQuantum, LLC, based in
Encino, Calif. “Part of the problem is that the buyers are just
overwhelmed by the choices they face on a daily basis,” adds Raissen.
“They know on the one hand they have to be innovative, but at the
same time, there’s a risk the product won’t move, and they
won’t get their return on a peg or linear basis.”
The meals of change
Meanwhile, the consumer isn’t waiting around to
witness the outcome. As one grocery store closes and/or consolidates, there
are 10 other retailers (and restaurants) down the road ready to satisfy a
consumer’s specific meal needs — which, by the way, are rapidly
changing.
It’s not about ingredients anymore, it’s
about meal solutions. “While supermarkets struggle to come up with a
different focus, they have to realize we’re seeing a different
supermarket consumer — she’s looking more like a European
consumer these days,” says Dell. “Not every consumer, but many,
are buying daily for what they need tonight. They go to a hypermarket
(supercenter) or club store to pantry-load on the weekend, but during the
week, they’re filling in. Four to six o’clock is the highest
volume time in a supermarket today, Monday to Friday.”
Wal-Mart and the middle
But the change doesn’t end there for the
industry. “The grocery channel is really in trouble in the middle of
the store,” says Barry Seifer, principal of strategy for Cubellis
Marco Retail Design, Northville, Mich. “The center of the grocery
store, the true grocery section, is a shrinking business, and the reason
for that is one hyphenated word — Wal-Mart.” According to
Seifer, “no one can out-cheap Wal-Mart,” and so the consequence
of a Wal-Mart supercenter opening in a supermarket’s trading area
“is typically about a 30 percent hit at the grocery section, the
center.”
|
But providing they get their strategy right and hang
in there, supermarkets do have a countervailing strength —
“entrenched real estate,” states Seifer. “The intense
localization of the supermarket industry, the location of stores within
dense and even semi-dense population areas, is a strength of the
conventional model,” he explains. “Wal-Mart is the No. 1 owner
of what’s called ‘dark real estate’ in the U.S.,”
he continues. “The way they have operated, they will gain approval
for a store, own and operate a store, but then they do not tend to renovate
once they’ve fulfilled their operating objectives. They close and
open another. That’s not the case with supermarkets.”
Moving feetto the treats
Coupled with entrenched locations comes sheer traffic,
and supermarkets have always excelled in that. Although weekly foot traffic
has decreased slightly from what it once was, the channel still gets about
2.1 trips per consumer — presenting many more opportunities for
impulse confectionery than the channel currently takes advantage of.
“Sure they have the foot traffic, but they
don’t convert people to buying candy that often with the exception of
the holidays,” contends one consultant who works with many in the
industry and wishes to remain anonymous. According to this
consultant’s data, most consumers (90-plus percent) buy confections
at some point from supermarkets, “but the conversion rate is low on
any one trip,” he says.
The National Confectioners Association has noted a
decline in dedicated confectionery space. “The channel is still the
No. 1 class of trade for confectionery products when you combine all
confectionery products sold there, but supermarkets have cut back or
remained the same in the past decade with confectionery gondola space, even
while overall store size is expanding by 25 percent,” reports Jenn
Ellek, director of trade communications and marketing.
According to the association’s recent report,
“Expanding the Dimensions of Confectionery, A $10 Billion
Opportunity,” the average supermarket retailer has between 250 and
300 items in the candy aisle, “but those who have more than 350 will
sell 22 percent more candy,” explains Ellek. Conversely, if retailers
average less than 250 items, they will sell, on average, 18 percent less
candy. “So the gap between less than average and more than average is
a 40-point spread,” she adds.
So while there’s no question that additional
variety sells more candy, there are other ways supermarket retailers can
reel in the candy business. Perhaps most obvious is for the channel to get
better at what it is already good at — holiday candy merchandising.
The fourth quarter is especially ripe with
opportunity, particularly if Thanksgiving is factored in. The NCA study
(conducted by Dechert-Hampe) revealed that 22 percent of consumers would
like to buy candy specifically for Thanksgiving, but there is very little
product offering available, particularly in supermarkets.
Christmas candy is also a large opportunity for the
supermarket channel, probably more so than retailers realize. “The
three busiest shopping weeks across all channels are the week before
Christmas, the week after Christmas, and Thanksgiving week,”
maintains Ellek. “The weeks between Thanksgiving and Christmas have
become tougher for retailers in general. Supermarkets have a huge
opportunity to sell more Christmas candy during that four-week period
because consumers continue to shop the channel during those
weeks.”
Future forays
Staying ahead of the curve is part of the
channel’s challenge in confections and in satisfying its consumers
overall. Self-checkouts are already changing the way retailers think about
merchandising candy and snacks at the front end. But in-aisle scanning
— where a device allows consumers to scan their products right from
the shelf, then drop it into a bag — is emerging, and if it catches
on the way many analysts think it will, many impulse purchases will have to
be rethought by retailers.
“The implication for front-end confection is
huge,” says David Fields, managing director of Ascendant Consulting,
LLC, Ridgefield, Conn. “The customer advantage of in-aisle scanning
is a fast checkout; by the time a customer reaches the register, he or she
is done shopping,” he explains.
Retailers and manufacturers will have to come up with
new ways to capture those sales. Fields’ initial ideas include candy
manufacturers buying some advertising space on the device whereby before a
customer finishes, the device will ask if they want to add a gum or candy
item.
|